Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Haywood

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Haywood[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The only mentions of this person in reliable publications seem to be interview articles, and therefore not secondary sources. This subject does not seem to meet our notability guidelines. The article seems to be promotional in tone. Salimfadhley (talk) 21:07, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. Note that Haywood is also an author, but the popular novel The Cactus was written by a different Sarah Haywood. pburka (talk) 22:34, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A very nice marketing piece. Will look good in a marketing brochure, but not suitable as an article here. By the way, what does it mean for a wedding planner to be "influential" in any way? The only thing a wedding planner can influence is the brand of bubbly that gets popped at the event, and that last a day. The rest of the world does not even hear the pop. Ode+Joy (talk) 21:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Party planner for the stars. Oaktree b (talk) 01:20, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.