Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Groenewald

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 10:23, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Groenewald

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a similar case to Jodie Bain, Ebony Weidenbach and perhaps most of all Deanna Niceski (due to the only coverage basically being about her career outside football).

I can't find any clear evidence of a WP:GNG pass for Groenewald, unfortunately. An Australian source search yielded only very brief mentions in match reports, stats databases and pages about her subsequent career as a pilates teacher. The pilates coverage is written by her or by organisations connected with her so do not count as independent coverage and therefore doesn't confer any notability. ProQuest has nothing of note and Google News has nothing at all. Out of the two sources currently cited, the Canberra Times one seems to be permanently dead, however, the title indicates that it's a match report while the FourFourTwo source is clearly only a trivial mention.

It's quite clear that this is a WP:BLP of someone who isn't in the public eye. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:48, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:49, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:51, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 19:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per nominator, fails WP:NFOOTBALL both sources in the article are 404 errors to me, my search finds social media sites and world football statistics therefore also failing WP:GNG in my opinion JW 1961^Talk 21:45, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:NFOOTBALL. Doesn't pass any notability guidelines.Brayan ocaner (talk) 21:02, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.