Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Calderwood

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:16, 9 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sarah Calderwood[edit]

Sarah Calderwood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I cannot find coverage which would support a sensible claim to notability nonsense ferret 01:12, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete but without prejudice. Could be a proper article could be written about her; but this ain't it. Currently, there are no reliable sources, just a link to her profile on her label's website, and to an article mostly about somebody else (see WP:NOTCONTAGIOUS). --Orange Mike | Talk 01:22, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 01:30, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per user:Orangemike: Professionally, she might cross over to notable enough in the future, but the article doesn't establish such a thing. An Aria award would be something, but.... Hithladaeus (talk) 01:48, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:05, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. ARIA nominee. WP:MUSIC#8. duffbeerforme (talk) 01:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Addressed concern of lack of citations with the addition of a number of references. Also provided proof of nominations of her album As Night Falls to ARIA awards in category Best World Music Album. werldwayd (talk) 13:11, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid I don't think this amounts to much in the way of establishing notability. There is a product catalogue, couple of bloggish online magazine things, a brief mention in passing re the waterboys and an article about the waterboys that doesn't as far as I can see mention her name. There's no indication that her nomination for this award got anything in the way of independent coverage. Ok there's a profile in ABC, but that isn't enough in my view to meet nmusic. --nonsense ferret 13:34, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for now as there isn't much significant and notable coverage to establish independent notability and my searches (News, Books, browser, thefreelibrary and highbeam) only found this ABC link. I also think there isn't enough to suggest moving elsewhere. SwisterTwister talk 19:26, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Nominated for an Aria, so meets WP:MUSIC. Doctorhawkes (talk) 09:10, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. In addition to an ARIA nomination her album charted on the ARIA Classical Albums chart link for entry peak at 15. I have place more references in the article so it now shows she satisfies WP:GNG as well as WP:MUSIC. The Parramatta Advertiser article indicates further coverage, stating "The Brisbane singer has perfect pitch and is receiving acclaimed reviews internationally with requests from BBC Wales and Radio Voce Spazio Italy." duffbeerforme (talk) 11:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - Bearing in mind that Wikipedia is loved for its vastness of coverage of pop culture, I find THIS piece in Onya Magazine. Not much more traction to get this past GNG but I put the link forward just in case. Carrite (talk) 04:46, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep Album has charted, and lots of coverage. Passes WP:MUSIC. Kraxler (talk) 18:06, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep satsifies WP:MUSIC and WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 07:10, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.