Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sarah Blackwood
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:20, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sarah Blackwood[edit]
- Sarah Blackwood (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
What good is a disambiguation page when the two pages it attempts to present are nonexistent? Raymie Humbert (local radar | current conditions) 17:29, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep both entries meet MOS:DABRL and so are valid. This dab helps people find pages which mention these women, both through clicking on 'What links here' and by the blue links on each line. Boleyn3 (talk) 17:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Boleyn.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Fishhead2100 (talk • contribs)
- Keep - per Boleyn. If one article is created, eventually, then delete the DAB (hatnotes are enough), but it's reasonably useful for now. It provides some information about them, enough to distinguish between the two, which is also helpful, Lord Spongefrog, (I am Czar of all Russias!) 20:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:09, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep; fits DAB page "regs" just fine. And neither disambiguated article is likely to remain a redlink for all that long. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ Contribs. 07:54, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep -- disambiguation entries need to have blue links, but those blue links are allowed to be in the description. -- JHunterJ (talk) 14:29, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.