Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Sorribes Tormo
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JohnCD (talk) 19:15, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Sara Sorribes Tormo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD: my original concern was that Sorribes Tormo does not pass the tennis notability guidelines. She has not been ranked in the top-200, she is not a top-3 junior player, she has no senior Grand Slam or Fed Cup appearances, and she has only played in the qualifying draw of the 2013 Mutua Madrid Open, i.e. no main draw WTA tour appearances either. In addition to this, Sorribes Tormo has never won a $50,000 ITF tournament or better. If requested, I wouldn't have a problem with the article being userfied and later being moved back into article space at such a time if/when the player in question does become notable. Jared Preston (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. czar · · 20:16, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I see no notability with this player. This really should not have been un-proded but the editor had the right to do so. When these articles are created there needs to be a link somewhere that shows they meet the notability criteria. Fyunck(click) (talk) 22:14, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete – per nom. (insufficient notability according to project guidelines).--Wolbo (talk) 22:35, 8 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no indication of notability. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:35, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.