Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Caldwell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Daask (talk) 20:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sara Caldwell[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot find WP:RS or WP:SIGCOV to support notability. Tacyarg (talk) 16:20, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 16:21, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 16:24, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 16:54, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Notable as a book author, her Jumpstart your awesome film production company book is held by 574 WorldCat member libraries. The article should be nominated for the cleanup. -- Gprscrippers (talk) 17:56, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Thousands of library holdings of her books and videos: [1] [2] [3]. A search for "Sara Coover Caldwell" in GBooks returns reviews of videos produced by her, such as two in this (and more in other volumes of that, including p 116 of vol 3 (search for "sara coover caldwell"+"motion masters" to find this)). James500 (talk) 18:41, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: Worldcat Identities shows substantial library holdings for her titles: [4], so I'm willing to give this subject the benefit of the doubt. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:49, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. - Certainly needs cleaning up but as shown above notability is certainly there. –Davey2010^Talk 15:47, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Notable. —AE (talk • contributions) 13:51, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep passes WP:42, notable enough for stand-alone article. Accesscrawl (talk) 18:14, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Redditaddict6 9 20:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per comments above. They aren't too persuasive but enough to say it probably should be kept- Redditaddict6 9 20:07, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.