Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sar Cheshmeh, Khuzestan (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 07:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sar Cheshmeh, Khuzestan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:GEOLAND:
Its population has been reported exactly 0 people in the 2016 census. Ctrl+F "067463" here.
See Special:Permalink/1016886834#Large batch deletion probably needed for more information. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:52, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
- Comment. WP:GEOLAND states, "Even abandoned places can be notable, because notability encompasses their entire history." That and WP:NTEMP formed the consensus to keep the article in the previous AfD. • Gene93k (talk) 04:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
- One needs to prove this is a village in the first place, not an abadi. To the closing admin, please note Special:Permalink/1016886834#Large batch deletion probably needed. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:04, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - No evidence that this was ever a legally-recognised populated place as required by WP:GEOLAND. Abadis are not legally-recognised populated places as they include wells, farms, pumps, factories etc. EDIT: looking at the pervious AFD for this article, it is a big pity it was not deleted then, but too many people then were simply ignoring the requirement that the place be legally recognised. FOARP (talk) 12:38, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.