Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saqism
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:27, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Saqism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
cant find any sources supporting this "philosophical school of thought" brewcrewer (yada, yada) 15:28, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: even if it existed, this article is utterly empty and meaningless (which principles? how unique? where do we find the central body of sacred writings?) Drmies (talk) 15:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I could not find any sources for this, and the article itself is unsourced as is. --Banime (talk) 15:35, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - all indications are that this was not a notable philosophy. It is quite likely either a typo of another philosophy, or a philosophy simply made up by the creator of the article. Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:42, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Possibly made up. No sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 17:01, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unknown to Google (other than a few people's usernames), JSTOR, and all libraries I can search. Also, I agree with Drmies: there's no distinguishable meaning to it at all. AnturiaethwrTalk 17:54, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above. Article was created by User:Saqibahmed, who has made no other contributions other than this one of his philosophy, which allows (at least one) individual "to be freed from the antiquated religious beliefs without guilt". Apparently, one of those antiquated religious beliefs is the concept of spreading the news to others. Mandsford (talk) 18:50, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - notability is not established nor does this topic appear to have any reliable sources. Wiw8 (talk) 21:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete religioncruft. JuJube (talk) 02:00, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unsourced, non-notable fringe belief - at best. More likely it's something just made up or an actual hoax. Edward321 (talk) 23:29, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.