Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santhosh Pandit (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Reaper Eternal (talk) 12:31, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Santhosh Pandit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:FILMMAKER; no coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Speedy deletion per db-repost was declined on the grounds that the article had substantially changed, but there's still no indication of notability here. Gurt Posh (talk) 14:33, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related article, because it likewise offers no indication of notability per Wikipedia:Notability (films), and has no coverage online from WP:Reliable sources:

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —Gurt Posh (talk) 14:37, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both. No evidence of notability. --Rob Sinden (talk) 15:54, 22 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 19:49, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Santhosh Pandit. Nothing has come forward to show notability since this article's snow deletion of 4 weeks ago.[1] And with its recreation, could an admin please look at the histories to see if this current version was different enough from its deleted predecessor to have not qualified for a G4 speedy? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 07:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete should be G4 speedied. --Sodabottle (talk) 09:40, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete Krishnanum Radhayum per WP:TOOSOON. Searches find it written of only in blogs, forums, and other unreliable sources.[2] Maybe later... but certainly not now. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 08:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - All reference cited here are NOT "Independent of the subject" - works produced by those affiliated with the subject or its creator. Looks like self-publicity/advertising/self-published material by the subject, autobiographies. - Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 08:32, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.