Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Santera Tequila

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Santera Tequila[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Advertisement for a beverage, which doesn't show any indication of notability. Searches on the engines only returned a couple of minor mentions on News. Can't find any in-depth coverage which shows this brand is notable. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 21:14, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 22:37, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:28, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: some industry and press-release stuff but no decent coverage in WP:RS. Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Vrac (talk) 18:52, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: entry has been updated with further online news articles and coverage. Further additions have been made to entry clearing WP:RS. Product is available for purchase and sale, clears WP:CORP and WP:GNG.Coreykam (talk) 19:14, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - The two additional citations don't meet the threshold of notability. The first is from Liquor.com, which isn't a reliable source, since it exists solely to promote alcoholic products. The second is a dead link. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 20:35, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment - Good catch. Article has been updated with notes. Liquor.com has been taken out of sources and the second link is now active. Additional links and information have also been added.38.99.10.106 (talk) 15:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —☮JAaron95 ^Talk 05:51, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now (draft & userfy if needed) as my searches found nothing better than some sponsorships and unfamiliar links. SwisterTwister talk 21:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the article fails to state a basis for notability. Editor Vrac is correct, there is some coverage, but not what one would call significant. Editor Coreykam's good faith attempt to add more really didn't. "Lifetailored" and "Headlines and Heroes" are interesting magazine/promotional websites but add little, the same with "Good Spirits News" published on wordpress. None of them would be considered reliable sources. --Bejnar (talk) 20:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.