Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sanstha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:00, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sanstha[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP is not a dictionary. Mattg82 (talk) 00:28, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NOTDIC as noted above. The article is just a definition of a term. Since it's pretty much just a translation of another language's word for definition, I don't think it warrants being added to wiktionary.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79[reply]
Delete as one of the clearest offenses against WP:NOTDICT I've ever seen. Mangoe (talk) 13:54, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:14, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. There's literally no information here beyond translating a word into English. If someone wants they could add it to wiktionary in about ten seconds, but it doesn't belong here. --Miskwito (talk) 22:08, 21 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.