Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sangeet Shikhharthee Sammilan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 06:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sangeet Shikhharthee Sammilan[edit]

Sangeet Shikhharthee Sammilan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to pass WP:GNG. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:46, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is one of four listed by me for AfD at the same time:

The above were all created by the same editor (who has a conflict of interest and has made almost all edits to these articles). One article he created may be notable. That is Alaka Das.

See also: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Bangladesh#Five new articles of questionable notability

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:31, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Worldbruce (talk) 09:39, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Non-notable family-run music school. It is unclear what level of education it offers, whether it is accredited, and whether it grants degrees. Searches of the usual Google types, HighBeam, JSTOR, and eight national newspapers, including by Bengali script name, found nothing more substantive than [1]. Fails WP:ORG. --Worldbruce (talk) 11:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.