Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandrina Bencomo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:14, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sandrina Bencomo

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don’t This this person meets WP:NMODEL. The awards she has won are lower tier, her agency signing routine, and coverage of her a mixture of routine and self-promotion. Thus article looks like a hook for her nutrition advice business. Mccapra (talk) 06:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Venezuela-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 06:24, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the Spanish article is much more non-promotional and gives details of her television appearances that are more notable. Perhaps scrap the current and replace with a translation? I'm not sure she is totally notable, but that would be a start. Kingsif (talk) 06:33, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have to agree with this. I'm not sure how to asses the notability, but the Spanish articles also appears to include different sources as well. --Jamez42 (talk) 14:08, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 12:12, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:29, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – I was unable to find any reliable secondary sources in Spanish and English covering the subject. The Spanish article is full of broken links, non-mainstream sources and primary sources. Missvain (talk) 23:59, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.