Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra de Helen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:22, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra de Helen[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a writer, completely unsourced except for a single unreliable source which fails to even verify the content being cited to it. There's enough substance here (she's claimed to have published quite a large volume of work) that she would probably be eligible to keep a properly sourced article — but it's the quality of the sourcing, not the volume or the potential impressiveness of any unsourced claims in the article, that determine whether she gets one or not. On a Google News search, however, she gets just five hits total and they're all glancing namechecks of her existence rather than substantive coverage. Delete, without prejudice against recreation in the future if and when her sourceability improves. Bearcat (talk) 22:27, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 22:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 22:52, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination, no indication of notability per WP:AUTHOR. NeemNarduni2 (talk) 22:50, 6 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. MB298 (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as currently questionable for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 21:54, 7 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not meet WP:ANYBIO or WP:GNG. found a review of one of her books here [1], that she was a 2000 finalist for the Angus L. Bowmer Award for Drama [2], and a 2013 nominee for The Yvonne Lynch Breakthrough Award of the Robert Finlay Awards [3], but this is not enough for notability. Also, WorldCat shows libraries only have 36 holdings of her works - [4]. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:23, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.