Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Ung

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 23:23, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Ung[edit]

Non-notable person. Chief of staff to a sub-national elected representative is not notable, even if that elected representative is the first Asian American in the New York State Assembly. nat.utoronto 03:33, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete (and tagged accordingly). She is was the chief-of-staff of a politician who isn't notable himself!--brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Actually, the assembly member is pretty notable seeing that the Chinese media published an article about him, especially since he's an American politician. nat.utoronto 03:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Don't worry, I don't have plans of dragging him to an afd. ;-). --brew crewer (yada, yada) 03:53, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment A sitting state assemblyman is inherently notable per guidelines for politicians. An attempt to AfD one will be met with an avalanche of speedy keeps. DarkAudit (talk) 03:54, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - Too tired to see that he wasn't going to do it. Good night. :p DarkAudit (talk) 03:59, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        See, I'm not the only person who edits Wikipedia while asleep. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 04:05, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        Me too, I'm actually in middle of dreaming that you're an admin ;-) --brew crewer (yada, yada) 04:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
        Will you guys keep it down in here? I'm trying to nap. --Dhartung | Talk 06:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not sure if its an a7. Some people might reasonably think its notable. we can deal with it here. DGG (talk) 04:38, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not even the chiefs of staff of Nancy Pelosi or Harry Reid get much ink. At the state level? Ixnay. --Dhartung | Talk 06:01, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. State legislators are considered notable. Their chiefs of staff are not. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:26, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable person, no refs, nothing. Harland1 (^t/_c) 06:47, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While a Google search for the exact phrase returned a respectable 788 results, by far the vast majority were either lists of people or were about people that were obviously not the same person mentioned in the article. I believe this fails notability, and if I had seen this, I would have tagged it under A7. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 13:48, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:54, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 17:55, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.