Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandra Romain

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:18, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra Romain

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Sigificant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, commercial websites, industry PR materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No significant awards or notable contributions to the genre. The awards listed are all scene related. Mainstream appearances are minor. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:21, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 09:03, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Nat965 (talk) 09:03, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Romain is one of the most famous porn actresses of Eastern Europe. Fonts in text and your minor mainstream appearances satisfy WP:BASIC. Guilherme Burn (talk) 12:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:45, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as No evidence of notability, hasnt won any notable/significent awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG –Davey2010^Talk 22:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep She passes the general notability guidelines. In addition to the sources in the article, google news reveals the following articles by Romania TV [1][2][3]. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:52, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I looked at the sources (romaniatv.net) and I don't believe they are suitable. This is not WP:SIGCOV needed to build an NPOV biography of a BLP. The coverage is shallow - she is married; they live on a farm; etc. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:44, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TonyBallioni (talk) 03:05, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - meets of the WP:PORNBIO and also WP:GNG. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 17:44, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Subtropical-man: how does the subject meet PORNBIO? Please help me understand. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Simply, Ninfa Award - no scene award - per WP:PORNBIO. Subtropical-man (talk / en-2) 15:01, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Nifta award is scene related: "Most Original Sex Sequence (with Melissa Lauren, Belladonna, Jenna Haze, Gianna Michaels, Rocco Siffredi & Jean Val Jean)". This does not meet PORNBIO; I believe you are mistaken. K.e.coffman (talk) 23:15, 27 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lacks the coverage to show notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:55, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:SIGCOV.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:23, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In addition to failing WP:GNG (sourcing is to brief tabloid clickbait features with photos, some are little more than captions,) she fails PORNBIO as per K.e.coffman, above. And PORNBIO sets a very low bar.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:03, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ansh 666 21:30, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for failing WP:PORNBIO from any angle imaginable. Went carefully through the "keep" votes but they're based on nothing of substance. A few are using false evidence, too. -The Gnome (talk) 17:15, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
delete not the substantive sourcing a BLP deserves. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.