Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandesh Jagtap

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mz7 (talk) 21:42, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sandesh Jagtap

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Student politician who fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG. Of the seven references used 1 & 2 are passing mentions, 3 & 4 don't mention the subject at all, 5 & 6 aren't working but appear to be to the website of an organization he is a member of and 7 is his personal website. GPL93 (talk) 18:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 18:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GPL93 (talk) 18:10, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not a notable politician as per WP:NPOL or WP:ANYBIO ~ Amkgp 💬 18:45, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Non-notable politician. LefcentrerightDiscuss 23:31, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As usual, holding a role with the youth wing of a political party is not an "inherently" notable political office that guarantees a Wikipedia article, and India is still not more special than any other country no matter how many times the Indian contingent tries to ignore the established consensus. And as for the sourcing, it's split about 50-50 between primary sources that are not support for notability at all, and glancing namechecks of his existence in media coverage that is not about him to any non-trivial degree, so there's no argument to be made that he would clear WP:GNG in lieu of having to hold a notable political office. Bearcat (talk) 22:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.