Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Tyagi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Juliancolton | ^Talk 21:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sandeep Tyagi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My PROD was noticeably quickly removed by what I presume to be both an advertising-only and COI account, because this entire article (regardless of anything or anyone) clearly only exists for advertising and that alone, so WP:NOT certainly applies. Also, as the PROD said, it's clear there are attempts to fluff-puff everything to make this seem like an entirely "informative and neutral" article but it's far from that, so with advertising and WP:NOT, it's clear. The awards, once again, are clearly trivial and nothing else would show them to be anything else, and even mentioning them is clear advertising alone. SwisterTwister talk 05:37, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Promotional spam, mentions only in passing, no in-depth sources, fails WP:BIO. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 08:08, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Judging from what I read here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability, I believe Sandeep Tyagi passes the notability test. A search of "Sandeep Tyagi" in Googlenews reveals lots of verifiable references. See results here https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Sandeep+Tyagi%22&tbm=nws. Sandeep is a notable entrepreneur known across India and America. The references used on the article are proofs.

Secondly, the article has been neutralized by another editor after the "PROD" placed by User:SwisterTwister. I wonder why he or she decided to place the deletion discussion tag after the PROD issue was addressed. I believe this is rather discouraging on my part. I hope a wiki admin will take a look at this properly and offer the best judgement. ThanksRussiagitaa (talk) 08:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:25, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Obviously solely promotional, the above keep was the article creator Layla, the remover (talk) 13:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There's enough in the write-up to get past WP:GNG. I just took a closer look at the references used. The page is also factual and non-promotional in essenseGermcrow (talk) 10:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Taking a closer look at the references, just as suggested, there are no substantial actual references about him. There are a few brief notices of his companies, there are a few articles he wrote, there's his name on his list, there's this self-written bio for an Emerald journal, and there are references about people of the same name who are not him. DGG ( talk ) 21:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.