Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandbox tree records

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui  11:45, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sandbox tree records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable record label. I would have speedy deleted it, but the article has survived for seven years so a week longer to discuss it won't do any harm. I couldn't find reliable sources to indicate any notability for this[1]. Fram (talk) 16:30, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Maine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No notable signed artists, no chart action, no awards. I can find no independent, reliable mentions (trivial or otherwise) mentions of the label except for the Wikipedia mirrors and content grabbers. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 14:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.