Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San francisco gate
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy delete as nn-club. Stifle (talk) 21:37, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- San francisco gate (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Notability not established, no sources. Google[1] finds only references to the San Francisco Gate newspaper, zilch on the club, its founder, or their rival teams. Weregerbil 05:09, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Nom. The article is also poorly written... typos, POV, etc.
- Weak Delete, If it is re-written and sources put into the article then I would say to keep it. But if it remains in its present stage, get rid of it. Callelinea 05:34, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no sources and poorly written. Oysterguitarist 06:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, so far as I can tell this is all amateur league play (e.g. [2][3]). The U.S. has entered a CONCACAF competition and won but I couldn't find any evidence that these teams are playing at that level. --Dhartung | Talk 06:16, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Create Redirect Page with links to Golden Gate Bridge and San Francisco Chronicle Article is unnotable, but might as well put this to good use as a redirect. Nate 06:20, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Wikidudeman (talk) 11:51, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.