Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Benancio, California

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:01, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

San Benancio, California[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article has a peculiar history, to say the least, and it was put up for speedy deletion early on. The GNIS link, for a long time, pointed to a nearby subdivision; searching GNIS gives two hits for the canyon/gulch and one for a middle school, but no "populated place". The topos consistently show the canyon/gulch label when they have anything at all, and while there is always something of a smear of buildings down the canyon, nothing says it's a separate community. It seems to be a locale, not a notable settlement. Mangoe (talk) 03:56, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, see comments on Talk:San Benancio, California from article creator. Mangoe (talk) 03:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:39, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 08:40, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Evidently a distinct settlement containing numerous dwellings and a school. The US Government describes it here as a small community, and here as a community. ----Pontificalibus 09:57, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 09:44, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:02, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.