Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/San Andreas Multiplayer (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. Avi 18:16, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

San Andreas Multiplayer

Delete per WP:WEB. No independent, reliable sources, and cruft regarding history. Drat (Talk) 08:06, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Part Deux 04:03, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I agree, without having read the whole article, that original research is a problem. That being said, I tried a Google search test, and came up with >200,000 nonwiki ghits - way above the threshold of notability. That kind of recognition doesn't get us to snowballs in hell, but maybe to snowballs in the Sahara desert. I'll put on a cleanup tag. YechielMan 05:56, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Only 220 of those hits are unique.--Drat (Talk) 10:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I agree that having read the article it does need to be improved, but having taken a look around google and taking into account what this mod does I'm finding it fair to believe this is a very notable game in the modding community and as such I'm sure there must be articles/reviews of it out there in in print magazines etc... I'd suggest letting somebody in the appropriate WikiProject know about this and letting them get on to improving it. Mathmo ^Talk 13:18, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn game mod. Stifle (talk) 23:04, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mods are rarely ever notable, and I don't see anything to make this one of those rare exceptions. TJ Spyke 02:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The quarter million Google hits suggest to me that this mod is indeed notable. (jarbarf) 19:01, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete unless reliably sourced. Addhoc 10:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.