Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Lalrozama Hmar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Article was G11'ed by DGG, who neglected to close this. Any concerns should be taken up with him, not me. (non-admin closure) Smartyllama (talk) 18:23, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel Lalrozama Hmar[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hyperbolic autobiographical article that does not meet any notability criteria specifically WP:NMMA or WP:KICK PRehse (talk) 12:06, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. PRehse (talk) 12:08, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Gameinfirmary (talk) 12:21, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There's nothing to show he meets the notability criteria for actors, martial artists, kickboxers, MMA fighters, or authors. What at first appears to be lots of sources turns out to be lots of routine sports reporting. Accomplishments seem to be very exaggerated and often unsupported (member of the Illuminati and Freemason, significant movie role as an unnamed character). The lack of independent and significant coverage indicates that WP:GNG is also not met. Main author is an SPA and this is likely an autobiography. Papaursa (talk) 23:25, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and stub There's a lot of stuff here sourced off Youtube or Scribd that is not a reliable source. But there's probably enough that is reliably sourced to meet minimum WP:BLP standards. Needs clean-up, but not necessarily deletion. Simonm223 (talk) 17:56, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please show me the multiple independent reliable sources that give significant coverage of him? As I said before, what I see is lots of routine sports reporting which does not show that WP:GNG is met. Papaursa (talk) 00:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete-G11 stuff.Invoke TNT, please.....∯WBG^converse 09:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.