Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel H. Kim

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 16:22, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Samuel H. Kim[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Lacks significant coverage in multiple sources - only one source is cited for the article. Tagged for lacking additional sources since 2011. Article subject requests deletion (VRT Ticket 2021111510010276). Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 16:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Korea-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 17:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The subject certainly seems to have the relative obscurity to make such a request reasonable. Ravenswing 20:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Significant coverage only in the NHL article already cited. All other sources encountered mention him in passing because he was the hockey team's spokesperson and interpreter. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 23:35, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - not enough evidence of significant coverage to overcome the subject's request. Rlendog (talk) 17:09, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:40, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.