Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsung Galaxy Z series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep per snowball clause; the nomination advanced a rationale for a hatnote, not deletion. XOR'easter (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

Samsung Galaxy Z series

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a current high-end model of foldable smartphone by Samsung but it can also refer to older model of Samsung Galaxy Z series which uses Tizen as an operating system Vitaium (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Vitaium (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. Vitaium (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. Vitaium (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Vitaium (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Vitaium (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Vitaium (talk) 02:18, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - That's not a valid deletion reason. You can use a hatenote like {{distinguish}} or {{about}} for Tizen#Smartphone or something if necessary, but the current subject is notable with plenty of coverage, and this article should not be deleted. MarginalCost (talk) 05:59, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. MarginalCost is right. There is a serious risk in nominating at AFD an article that you don't think should be deleted. Depending on who turns up you may find it being deleted against all reason. Thincat (talk) 10:27, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Unclear reason for deletion. NemesisAT (talk) 12:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This article is a little short and could use some more content, but the subject (Samsung Galaxy Z product line) is clearly notable. In fact, it is so notable that there are actually four different articles about different models in this product line. Anton.bersh (talk) 19:00, 6 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep because the reason for deletion is incorrect. This article is notable. It doesn't need to be deleted. But the article is little short. It needs to be improved. ThePremiumBoy (talk) 03:32, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep - no deletion rationale given. PianoDan (talk) 18:27, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.