Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samote Union Council

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mkdw ^talk 01:49, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Samote Union Council

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero supporting references, nothing special to require a standalone article. If it exists then perhaps it should be merged into another article. Richard Harvey (talk) 18:21, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete existing content and history due to the material being based upon original research. It is worth noting that this is one of a series of unsourced articles created by new user Saadat Hussain Malik (talk · contribs). This individual has been creating numerous village/town stubs of this sort for the past 2-3 weeks, many of which are either copy-paste copyvios or short unreferenced articles like this one. While several members of the community have made attempts to communicate with Saadat Hussain Malik regarding these specific concerns, they have been completely ignored and the editor carries on as before. The only links provided within this and other articles are http://www.pothwartimes.com and http://www.pothwar.com/ which I am unable to parse for relevancy or reliability as it appears to be in the Urdu language. I am unsure if it qualifies as an external link or should be removed per WP:ELNO, and will defer to another experienced editor who is proficient to make that assessment. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:24, 15 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:14, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 19:02, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.