Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samir Ibrahim Zedan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 02:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Samir Ibrahim Zedan

Only has a handful of credits to his name, not notable enough. Punkmorten (talk) 14:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:BIO and WP:NOTABILITY. Kittybrewster ☎ 15:26, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:04, 18 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TravellingCari 01:41, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:50, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sounds potentially important and interesting. Just needs work on it. Try sources beyond the internet. Iraqi and Norwegian media and scholarship for example.--Oxonian2006 (talk) 21:26, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Irrelevant - why should scholars write about this person when he only has one credit? You want someone else to dig up sources that don't exist. Irresponsible. By the way Norwegian media search yields one hit, back in 2000]. Punkmorten (talk) 10:18, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No denying the man exists. However, I can find nothing online that shows any special notability for his work. Some of his films get reviewed, but I can find nothing that specifically addresses his works in film. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:00, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 14:39, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.