Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samarth singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 03:11, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Samarth singh[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable per WP:BIO, no significant coverage online in WP:Reliable sources, WP:Conflict of interest by article's creator. Proposed deletion was removed without explanation by anonymous editor. Invitrovanitas (talk) 16:05, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Invitrovanitas (talk) 16:06, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- -- Cirt (talk) 22:49, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Invitrovanitas (talk) 20:20, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non-notable founder of a non notable company. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 07:25, 2 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Hybrid Content Inc. is hardly non-notable given the sales figures that have jumped almost 15 times over the last 4 years. And the amount of controversy the owner has kicked up when he was a journalist is hardly non-notable either.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.79.133.21 (talk) — 114.79.133.21 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Comment The article isn't about the company, it's about its founder, and being the head of a notable company doesn't necessarily make someone notable per WP:BIO. There are no WP:Secondary references cited about Singh or his company, and increases in sales revenue don't make a company notable per WP:COMPANY. There is almost zero coverage about either one online from WP:Reliable sources. Can you please provide some reliable cites showing why he's notable? Thanks, Invitrovanitas (talk) 09:22, 6 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The article does not mention that he was a journalist, unless you are talking about Jam which is a college student mag and he was probably just a contributor. Doesn't count as journalism. And writing a mildly critical review of your college is hardly controversial. --Deepak D'Souza (talk) 04:25, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete LOLz.. Somebody please tell why this article should NOT be deleted! A self proclaimed "everything" isn't worth to be listed on wikipedia — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vamsisv (talk • contribs) 10:10, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - likely to become wiki noteworthy, but presently not enough WP:RS coverage for me to support. Off2riorob (talk) 11:47, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.