Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Schmoker
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete ♠PMC♠ (talk) 13:59, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
Sam Schmoker[edit]
- Sam Schmoker (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person. Winning a state boys' contest doesn't suffice under WP:NTENNIS, nothing else in the article suggests notability, and little independent coverage turns up in online searches, failing to meet WP:GNG. Largoplazo (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- He is a well known man in Shanghai. He is just not that present on the internet — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.232.140.149 (talk) 01:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- A finding of notability based on being well-known calls for evidence of this under the terms of the general notability guidelines. We'd need to know there are a number of independent reliable sources giving him substantial coverage. Largoplazo (talk) 02:11, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 11:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alaska-related deletion discussions. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 11:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete nothing to suggests any notability WP:BIO, WP:GNG or WP:NTENNIS. As attested to by IP above just a well known local. KylieTastic (talk) 12:45, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The first reference is the very definition of trivial coverage, it mentions him in passing as someone who won a doubles championship (not individual state champion as implied int he article) ten years ago. The other source isn't a proper reference at all, and the only mention it makes of the article subject is that they are a contact person for events. That falls well short of general notability. Beeblebrox (talk) 02:29, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly fails WP:GNG and WP:NTENNIS. Edwardx (talk) 23:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.