Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Cooke (model)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Pretty clear consensus: and as for notability, I don't keep track of "page 3 girls" and I've heard of her. (non-admin closure) —Tom Morris (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sam Cooke (model)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very vague notability. Would suggest deletion. Cloudbound (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. As above, is a current model and has won Page 3 Idol, which is sufficient notability. Tiller54 (talk) 15:19, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 17:00, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. — frankie (talk) 17:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steven Zhang ^{The clock is ticking....} 00:06, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Two prior keeps at AfD vs. very vague nominating statement. Would suggest close.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 00:22, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.