Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sam Bowman
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. czar 01:08, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sam Bowman (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doubtful notability - has long had a notability tag on the page. Any useful content can probably be merged into other pages (e.g. the ASI's)? Annecremin (talk) 01:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:21, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Economics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:22, 25 April 2020 (UTC)
- Delete does not meet inclusion criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:42, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:52, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, not enough RS to be found. Caro7200 (talk) 15:35, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.