Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvus Water

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Bükkszék. Content can be merged from page histories. ansh 666 06:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Salvus Water

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

For something that purportedly cures diabetes, dyspepsia, gastric ulcer, gastritis, gastric hyperacidity, colitis, acute subglotticus laryngitis, acute inflammation of the lower respiratory tract, chronic inflammation of the lower respiratory tract, asthma, bronchiestasia, chronic bronchitis and COPD .... in addition to loco-motor disorders and gynecological diseases (presumably also effective at treating nail biting, an affinity for K-Pop, and not using your turn signal) there sure ain't much written about it. There's passing mention in a barely readable paper on tourism, passing mention is a somewhat more legible business thesis, there's whatever this and this are. Then there's some people apparently trading home remedies online. Apparently an overall non-notable local piece of FRINGE tourism. GMG ^talk 18:55, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hungary-related deletion discussions. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:37, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I took took the liberty of swapping the primary AFD topic from (Society Topics) to (places). And I won't be aroudn to answer for my deeds as I need to get my affinity for K-Pop cured. L3X1 Become a New Page Patroller! (distænt write) 00:39, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Leaning ~~merge~~ redirect. There are a few mentions I've found on google, but I'm sure there's an alternative medicine article this could be merged into that would be sufficient, I just don't know which one. Natureium (talk) 02:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I'd be interested to see what you found. I didn't really see enough to write a stand-alone section, much less a stand alone article. I'd be fine with a redirect if I had any idea what a valid target might be. GMG ^talk 11:46, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article on Bükkszék already says that it's about the only notable thing in that place, so a couple sentences in that article could suffice with Salvus water redirecting there, or the article could just be deleted without redirect, because if you search for it, that's the article in the results anyway. Natureium (talk) 18:03, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect to Bükkszék seems agreeable. I'm not sure it's really a merge in any meaningful sense. GMG ^talk 00:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merge per Natureium (talk) last remark above.--Dthomsen8 (talk) 00:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:52, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. A prior article under this title, and which at the time had substantially the same content, was moved into userspace by me per the request of User:Dthomsen8 (see User talk:Metropolitan90/Archive 25#Talk page:Salvus Water). See User:Dthomsen8/Salvus Water. If this article is kept, I believe that a history merge would be appropriate. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:30, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.