Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvo (magazine)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Salvo (magazine)

Non-notable. 5000 copy print run is miniscule. Maybe in the future this startup will be notable, but it isn't now, and it will take a lot of money to make it so. SchmuckyTheCat (talk) 15:35, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep [http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=38119 this] looks like substantial, independent coverage to me. Jclemens (talk) 02:53, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

World Net Daily is not a reliable source. SchmuckyTheCat (talk)

Where was that determined? Niteshift36 (talk) 06:06, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. http://www.salvomag.com/new/audio.php lists a goodly amount of coverage, including by a number of groups we have articles on, WDLM-FM, Discovery Institute, Point of View (radio show). Here's one not listed there, Orthodoxy Today print interview. An editor is Rebecca Hagelin, whom we also have an article on.[1] Writers for it include Herbert London,[2] Casey Luskin, [3], Caroline Crocker [4] all of whom we also have articles on. Its articles are reprinted in Independent Women's Forum.[5] Of course "we have an article on them" isn't the same as "they are a reliable source", and no one of these sources is the Washington Post ... but there are a lot of them. All considered together, it's enough for Notability. --GRuban (talk) 14:20, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep - Google News brings up a number of hits, but nothing I could add to the article to prove notability. GRuban's argument is what tips me over from weak delete to weak keep. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:48, 23 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.