Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvec
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Narvacan, Ilocos Sur. MBisanz talk 23:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Salvec[edit]
- Salvec (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
A previously deleted article. A probable hoax, this version is an expanded form of the previous article still with no references. Bluemask (talk) 02:50, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- As of this revision, the hoax part of the article was removed, therefore, I withdraw my nomination. Although, I suggest merging this barangay article to its parent municipality (Narvacan, Ilocos Sur) article. --Bluemask (talk) 00:57, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The place is real, named Sulvec, not Salvec. It is a popular vacation spot. It should be geography stubbed and re-written, which I have started to do. I have used hidden text to remove all the unverifiable information. Assuming the article stays I will remove the hidden text in a month. Miami33139 (talk) 03:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep or Merge to parent municipality. The last version is clearly a hoax since I was unable to find reliable info on a place named Salvec or that hoax Prince. However, the real one seems to be a tourist spot and military base of operations.--Lenticel (talk) 04:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to Narvacan, Ilocos Sur. The parent article could use some expanding. --seav (talk) 05:54, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: the version that was nominated for deletion was kinda hoaxy compared to the version that can be seen right now. --seav (talk) 06:00, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:20, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.