Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salvation Army Hough Center

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:20, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salvation Army Hough Center[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged for notability for over 5 years; seems non-notable. Boleyn (talk) 10:39, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep #2 deletion spree. Unscintillating (talk) 01:36, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Nominating a large number of articles - all of which have been tagged for notability for at least 5 years - does not meet speedy keep no. 2. Boleyn (talk) 08:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The applicable terminology from WP:SK#2 is "unquestionable disruption". Unscintillating (talk) 02:11, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As neither noun nor -- especially -- adjective actually apply here, your rationale is irrelevant at best. --Calton | Talk 16:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An operational definition of unquestionable disruption is available at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ioannis Diakidis. FYI, Unscintillating (talk) 22:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:50, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Neutrality^talk 11:05, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:46, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - A city community center, with no evidence or even implication of greater-than-neighborhood importance. --Calton | Talk 16:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.