Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salmat

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sam Walton (talk) 13:52, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Salmat[edit]

Salmat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Basically just a company advert for a non-notable company. Fails WP:GNG, WP:CORP and WP:PROMO. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:55, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:03, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 00:03, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete by WP:GNG Shad in Net 01:28, 19 June 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shad Innet (talkcontribs)
  • Delete for now and draft to a willing user's userspace as my searches found several results but nothing that appears solid here (News, results fade page 3), here, here ("leading multi-channel communications and customer services company") and here. SwisterTwister talk 18:58, 19 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:23, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95 (Talk) 14:29, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • Comment actually Bearian, that's not correct, the company is public traded on the ASX.[1] Adpete (talk) 07:25, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, poor article content is not a valid deletion reason. This company clearly meets WP:GNG as is evidenced by numerous articles in the Fairfax Media publications. There are over 8,000 mentions of the company in Factiva over 30 years. A search of EBSCOhost's Australia/New Zealand Reference Centre yields over 400 results. Obviously not all of these results are significant coverage but there are many many examples. Hack (talk) 12:10, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.