Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sally Yoshino
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 06:06, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The article does not meet the guidelines of WP:BIO. Therefore, delete. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 01:26, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. She appears to be notable in her "field", and most JAV actresses are hard-pressed to meet WP:PORN BIO as it is now. 51,000 Ghits, 315 unique. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 04:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Unless her name is more common than I think, she seems to get enough referencs to warrant an article. StuffOfInterest 13:16, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletions. -- Neier 13:44, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment 198,000 G-Hits on her Japanese name. Neier 13:47, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete Doesn't meet WP:PORN BIO (hence "delete") but Coredesat's comments are interesting (hence "weak") --CPAScott 15:46, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep. It doesn't necessarily meet WP:PORN BIO but I think this article deserves to stay per the number of Google hits. --Nishkid64 16:23, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep per Coredesat as well. (|-- UlTiMuS ( U • T • C | M • E ) 20:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Vehement Delete Her pantaloons are unclean! --Xrblsnggt 02:39, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment she's Japanese, PORN BIO is biased towards North American pornstars. 132.205.93.86 03:07, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have to agree with the anonymous poster that WP:PORN BIO reeks of systemic bias in its current form and shouldn't be used as a notability guideline. --TheFarix (Talk) 13:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I find this odd, because I quoted WP:BIO, not WP:PORN BIO, which doesn't cover Japanese pornographic performers as of yet. Interesting. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 01:26, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have to agree with the anonymous poster that WP:PORN BIO reeks of systemic bias in its current form and shouldn't be used as a notability guideline. --TheFarix (Talk) 13:55, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep If any JAV actress is notable, she is. - Wickning1 15:32, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Well, if she is, then where's the claim of notability? -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO? 16:21, 16 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Yoshino is a notable Japanese model. Yamaguchi先生 08:09, 17 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.