Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sallah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Mojo Hand (talk) 14:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sallah[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline requirement nor the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (fiction) supplementary essay. Few mentions in passing fail WP:SIGCOV. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Reception section (which also discusses merchandise) could be integrated with the List of Indiana Jones characters. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 10:54, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep I agree with the nominator, but it still has a number of reliable references. -Cupper52^Discuss! 11:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Cupper52, The issue is that they need to be relevant - see WP:SIGCOV. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:47, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Reasonably notable as a character depicted across several media. BD2412 T 04:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- BD2412, But the (very few) depictions are not in depth. WP:SIGCOV, people... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 05:48, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well now you've gone and made me add a source or two. BD2412 T 06:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    - BD2412, Thanks for finding [1] although a report on an interview at a local comicon... hmmm... well, it's helpful, I guess, but I am still not convinced we are meeting GNG here. Anyway, is there a reason you did not link to the news piece directly when adding the ref to the article? I had to google to find it... _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 03:12, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
      - I searched Newspapers.com, rather than the internet. You get a different set of results. BD2412 T 04:00, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. My own WP:BEFORE search on Google.com, Google News and Google Books did not reveal a lack of significant coverage which the nominator claimed the topic lacks. In fact, the developmental/behind the scenes section can be expanded even further. Haleth (talk) 06:02, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Apparently Excavating Indiana Jones: Essays on the Films and Franchise, Randy Laist, ed., (McFarland, April 3, 2020), offers a number of essays discussing the character, but I can only view snippets. BD2412 T 06:10, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.