Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salif Gueye

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The deletion rationale was not challenged with policy-based arguments. Modussiccandi (talk) 07:51, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salif Gueye

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this is basically a fan site praising Gueye with nothing that's actually sourced to independent rs - just a brief 15 seconds of fame for dancing on Ellen, he never won an awrd and theres no coverage otherwise PRAXIDICAE💕 16:47, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Dance, Fashion, and France. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page have been improved, and added another achievements of artist. Rma17 (talk) 15:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC) — Note to closing admin: Rma17 (talk • contribs) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this XfD. [reply]

Keep: The page have been improved, and added another achievements of artist. Rma17 (talk) 21:40, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 02:52, 1 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG. Sources are passing mention or fansites. LearnIndology (talk) 03:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sources have been cleared. Need some help and check again. Rma17 (talk) 18:46, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:21, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just want to note that Salif does have 2.3 million instagram followers - and while I'd hardly want Wikipedia to be composed by the basis of how many social media followers a person has, it does lend credibility that the individual has some degree of following / "real world notability" and isn't simply a backup dancer or similar A MINOTAUR (talk) 03:24, 9 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Salif Gueye's name is already on Wikipedia in another pages. He performed in Montreux Jazz Festival, Michael Jackson night, etc. Also Michael JAckson's official site adds Salif Gueye's performs. He called Next to Michael Jackson and continues his history. Rma17 (talk) 11:45, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I31f6OOtbkE&list=WL&index=22&t=35s Rma17 (talk) 11:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Followed are not a good measure. Followers and likes can both and are often bought. PRAXIDICAE💕 12:48, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Salif Gueye have verified instagram account. It means followers and likes are real. Rma17 (talk) 16:41, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
No, it absolutely doesn't. Instagram doesn't verify each follower of verified accounts. Get real. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They cannot check each follower one by one. Fake followers makes low activity of profile, which instagram can check: Followers are raising, Activity is going down. Actually Instagram gives verify for famous people. Rma17 (talk) 15:36, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If u thinks that his followers and likes are boughted, check the comments (2500). Rma17 (talk) 15:43, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment https://youtube.com/shorts/i4Z20zw6X7A?feature=share

Here is some screen saves from Salif's instagram profile. People recognizing him and taking picture with him. He is famous one in his early age. Rma17 (talk) 02:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

None of this is policy based. Please do not bludgeon the conversation if you're not going to provide policy based input. Star Mississippi 02:38, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.