Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salah Choudhury

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:54, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Salah Choudhury[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Controversially listed. No such Primary sources in notability. Morever, there is probable UPE/COI is seen in in the wiki entry. Most of the resource just have a mention and the citatited coverage are from same source. - NeverTry4Me - TT page 08:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. NeverTry4Me - TT page 08:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. NeverTry4Me - TT page 08:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. NeverTry4Me - TT page 08:48, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 09:00, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per the talk page, the Weekly Blitz article was redirected here, I'm wondering if this makes the article notable as an editor of a newspaper. although I'm not familiar with that particular newspaper. Oaktree b (talk) 16:57, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Am a {{tpw}} on the nom. and have been concerned about some of their actions - which raise from good to what in my view is highly problematic. So myself and the nom. are developing history. The nomination is WP:VAGUEWAVE inviting those coming to the discussion to try and sift through sources and contributions to determine what's what and where the COI/UPE might be. The nom has over shame tagged the article here, and even worse has de-contexted the "Assaults" section here. Without digging further I'm at this moment concerned there may be an attempt to wipe this Bangladeshi publication/journalist from WikiPedia. Thanmkyou. Djm-leighpark (talk) 09:37, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Choudhury is a controversial journalist and newspaper editor in Bangladesh because of his pro-Israel stance. That is why the world has taken wide notice of him over many years. I see no evidence of conflict of interest editing. If the nominator cares to back up those allegations with details, any such problems can be fixed through editing. There is ample significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, such as [1][2][3]. Easily passes WP:GNG. --Worldbruce (talk) 02:56, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:21, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep There is evidence of significant coverage. There does not seem to be any valid reason to delete the article.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:18, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Per others and my initial thoughts. Djm-leighpark (talk) 12:28, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.