Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakurako Okubo

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Missvain (talk) 00:09, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sakurako Okubo[edit]

Sakurako Okubo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG or WP:NACTRESS. No notable third party source found of actress. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 06:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 06:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 06:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 06:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 06:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 06:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 06:05, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I found three sources about her in Japanese. [1] [2] [3]. ミラP 15:52, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Miraclepine, not a significant source. They just say she has a bikini photoshoot. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:29, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. No evidence of notability as it stands. Looks more like the agency's page at the moment. Deb (talk) 16:08, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep as the actress has at least three prominent roles in notable television series and therefore passes WP:NACTOR with the sources above and in the article confirming the roles. It wasn't written by the agency but is a translation of the Japanese wikipedia article, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 18:34, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Atlantic306, in one series, which does not pass criteria, which requires MULTIPLE roles.
    Plus, this all requires the presence of third-party sources covering her, which I think there are scant. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 19:47, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    in three series Uchu Sentai Kyuranger, Atlantic306 (talk) 20:18, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Atlantic306, two series, three crossovers. So she played a total of 2 roles, one for Uchu Sentai Kyuranger and Blackfox: Age of the Ninja, apparently according to the article. --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 20:20, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Four projects that are notable means a pass of WP:NACTOR, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:23, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    Atlantic306, which criteria? 3 of them are for the same role. Criteria states: "has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions." --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 21:07, 18 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak Keep: The actress has had main roles in various productions (despite playing the same character, but I don't think that is problematic). The notability of the productions, however, may be in question. Dflaw4 (talk) 05:48, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep passes WP:NACTOR has had significant roles. Lightburst (talk) 18:13, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.