Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sakala Kala Vallabhudu
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Consensus is that sourcing doesn't meet requirements for notability. Star Mississippi 02:00, 30 January 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sakala Kala Vallabhudu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet the requirements of WP:NFILM with routine coverage/press releases. Barring a review from 123Telugu, cannot find any reliable reviews in Telugu and English. -- Ab207 (talk) 07:58, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Ab207 (talk) 07:58, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Ab207 (talk) 07:58, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete This is the other one the page creator possibly had in mind, maybe even this (the site is used enough as a source in en-wiki). But NFILM and WP:GNG guidelines are rebuttable presumptions of notability, to be proved with enough sources for the policy WP:V when questioned at AfD. There is no reason now to presume that any new sources will ever be found for this 2 year old film, for the page to be anything beyond the stub it is. --Hemantha (talk) 12:03, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
- Keep the reviews found in this discussion by the previous poster along with Telegu sources are enough for a pass of WP:GNG so that deletion is unnecessary in my view, Atlantic306 (talk) 17:51, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
- 😀 To clarify, NTV Telugu was already there. Telugu Filmnagar definitely can't be used as a source since it is an outlet of a brand management company heavily involved with Telugu film production. hemantha (brief) 07:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 17:55, 15 January 2022 (UTC)Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:54, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Delete other than this, can't find anything. DareshMohan (talk) 01:33, 23 January 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.