Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saietta Group

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. plicit 00:01, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Saietta Group[edit]

Saietta Group (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not enough significant coverage to pass WP:CORP. Half the refs here are not independent coverage, and some are just passing mentions and routine business coverage. Uhooep (talk) 21:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Did you do a WP:BEFORE search? Searching "Saietta" in news on Google yields a ton of results and relevant independent sources. The company is notable, it's just the wrong references were added to the article. Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The vast majority of those Google News results pertain to the company's recent July Initial public offering (IPO). No IPO = no article, in many cases here. Uhooep (talk) 22:24, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 22:20, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep An online google search reveals a lot of online publications for example this one in Morning Star and The Oxford Magazine. Apopolips (talk) 22:21, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep, it doesn't matter if the coverage is largely due to its IPO, it is still significant coverage in many independent sources.Jackattack1597 (talk) 11:54, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.