Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Said Al Muzayin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. Hut 8.5 18:25, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Said Al Muzayin[edit]

Said Al Muzayin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced article. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BIO. Geoff | Who, me? 21:26, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawing nom as the article has had significant sources added which I could not find at the time of nomination. Clearly meets WP:GNG in its current form. Geoff | Who, me? 17:00, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Poetry, and Palestine. Shellwood (talk) 21:29, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy speedy speedy speedy speedy speedy speedy speedy keep — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A00:23C5:1C00:C001:581B:88:836F:A042 (talk) 21:44, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Speedy why? Oaktree b (talk) 23:30, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment I can't find anything, but I find it hard to believe there isn't something written about him, as he wrote famous national lyrics. In arab sources perhaps? Oaktree b (talk) 23:33, 15 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    I have found them and improved the article. CT55555(talk) 01:26, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep. He meets WP:GNG clearly. I've significantly improved the article. He wrote a national anthem and is clearly a notable leader, poet, writer and politician. CT55555(talk) 01:27, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    Keep seems to be a better article now, I think it's GNG. Oaktree b (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy keep Article has been improved dramatically since the nomination was made, and the subject has clear WP:GNG value. Iskandar323 (talk) 15:57, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment User:Glane23 would you consider withdrawing this one, in context of the changes and WP:SNOW? CT55555(talk) 16:04, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@CT55555: Done. See above Geoff | Who, me? 17:03, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. Hard to find English sources, but Arabic sources appear to exist. pburka (talk) 16:44, 16 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.