Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sahand & Sabalan Tower
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fritzpoll (talk) 13:31, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Sahand & Sabalan Tower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
From what little I could find in Google, these appear to be office buildings in Tehran. Gnews and gsearch for either building turns up enough to show that they exist, but nothing showing notability. However, I'm sure that language and transcription issues are messing with my search, so I'm bringing this to a wider audience than PROD. Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:11, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 17:13, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: no notability asserted, nothing I could find in the usual places. Despite what certain bits of the mass-media seem to believe existence is not a get-out-of-jail-free card for passing WP:N. Ironholds (talk) 17:25, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, doesn't assert, much less prove, notability. ~EdGl (talk) 17:50, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: No indication of notability. FlyingToaster 18:01, 27 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Note that List of tallest buildings and structures in Iran have these as separate structures. Their height indicates they may be notable, but I'm not seeing the sources. However, we should be aware of [[WP:BIAS] as sources are very likely to be non-English.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.