Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sah Al-Noom
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Vanamonde (Talk) 15:57, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
Sah Al-Noom[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sah Al-Noom (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable television series that fails WP:GNG Collaboratio (talk) 12:18, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:48, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Syria-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 12:48, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - the Arabic language article has three sources provided, indicating it passes GNG. matt91486 (talk) 05:08, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 13:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 13:38, 13 August 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:25, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- Tentative Keep - Three references are cited on the corresponding Arabic page. The first is a 2007 review in Al Riyadh, which appears to be a WP:NEWSORG. Whilst the machine translation is hard to read, it appears to be a laudatory review of this television program (it would be great if this could be confirmed by a native speaker). The second is a 2008 piece in Al Riyadh of a similar nature. The third is an archived article in Syrian Drama, which appears to have been a magazine (and thus a WP:NEWSORG). These would all appear to be instances of WP:SIGCOV but it would be great if a native Arabic speaker could confirm this. Assuming this is so, passes WP:GNG. FOARP (talk) 12:14, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.