Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sage (photographer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 00:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sage (photographer)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear notable. Article reads like a promotional puff piece, and none of the sources discuss the subject. --Bongwarrior (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:12, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Leaning delete. As a baby boomer, the article subject is no doubt innocent of concepts like search-engine friendly names, which makes turning up sources for this one difficult. The article sources actually do discuss the subject but it's one link deep from the cited pages. From the single source it's hard to tell if the subject meets WP:ARTIST criterion 4, so barring someone turning up with an armload of sources this one seems to be a delete. A Train^talk 20:01, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete Exactly as per A Train. My looks too. Looks like the subject should be notable but cannot find anywhere near sufficient for NEXIST. A telling source would be one that gave the subject's full name, and help separate it from PROMO. Aoziwe (talk) 20:55, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is the one page at the Portrait Gallery, but I'd expect more sources for notability. --George100 (talk) 06:19, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.