Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safety haircut
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:52, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Safety haircut (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I have found no verification of the topic anywhere. The text has the sort of pseudo-encyclopedic tone often found in hoax articles. Joyous! | Talk 10:42, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - if sources can be found. Otherwise delete Think outside the box 10:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- At AFD you are supposed to be seeing whether sources can be found. That means looking for them yourself. So far, the only editor to have actually looked for sources is Joyous!. You are supposed to be double-checking that, to provide an additional layer of swiss cheese to the process. Uncle G 11:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, I didn't realise that. No then, I can't find any reliable sources, although there are lots of mentions about safe haircuts - usually relating to less extravagant styles. Think outside the box 11:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- At AFD you are supposed to be seeing whether sources can be found. That means looking for them yourself. So far, the only editor to have actually looked for sources is Joyous!. You are supposed to be double-checking that, to provide an additional layer of swiss cheese to the process. Uncle G 11:01, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete can't find any reliable sources, so either a hoax or not notable. Hut 8.5 14:39, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - no google books results, no google images... Smmurphy(Talk) 18:13, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as possible hoax. If you notice, the article offers no description whatsoever of what a safety haircut actually is, but merely anecdotal information about it. Charlie 20:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, looks like something made up in school one day. This article was the author's only contribution, and it was probably on the edge of nonsense to begin with. --Elkman (Elkspeak) 20:33, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per Joyous and per WP:NFT. Edited to add: and WP:HOAX. --Charlene 21:11, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - it's probably just a local neologism, or slang, but it definitely has no sources, and should be deleted. --Haemo 22:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.