Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Saeid Khater

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:42, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Saeid Khater

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, most likely WP:AUTOBIO if you check the creator's username, of a computer programmer not reliably sourced as having any strong claim to passing our notability criteria for computer programmers. The footnotes here are almost entirely to primary sources that are not support for notability at all, such as Facebook posts and the self-published websites of organizations directly affiliated with the claims -- there's just one source that seems to be both WP:GNG-worthy and actually about the subject, which is nowhere near enough.
Nothing here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt him from having to have significantly better sourcing than this, and even if he were notable enough for a Wikipedia article he still wouldn't be entitled to write his own article himself. Bearcat (talk) 21:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Egypt. Bearcat (talk) 21:55, 15 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Primary sources do not support the subject's notability, fails GNG and WP:ANYBIO. Source 11, which looks like a secondary source doesn't seem to mention Khater or the fact that 30 people were selected. As mentioned above, the article potentially being an autobiography raises WP:COI issues; even if the subject is found to be notable, this article should go through the WP:AFC process or be rewritten by an uninvolved editor. Yeeno (talk) 00:52, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - clearly does not pass WP:GNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:46, 22 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.