Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Online (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:20, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sabrina Online[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sabrina Online (2nd nomination): while the new article has some info on what happened since then, there are no further claims to notability, so'salting' the same issues and arguments from the AfD still apply. Looking for better sources only gave me some online stores like Amazon selling the self-published paper versions of this comic. GNews gave no usable results. Fram (talk) 09:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Webcomics-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 09:39, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, sadly. Cute but not enough there in sources. Hyperbolick (talk) 10:30, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, and consider 'salting' the article title to prevent further creation without making a case to an administrator or similar that reliable, detailed sources have been found. In my search I only found one source that might demonstrate notability, a review at Comixtalk. However, both the reliability of this source and whether it is detailed enough to show notability are bouth questionable, so I would want at the least a second reliable, detailed source. Web Cartoonist Choice Awards can't demonstrate notability, as they are not detailed: they do not provide a description of the comic or basic facts beyond the name and author. HenryCrun15 (talk) 22:17, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above, also, creator was sock of FriendlyTamer. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:09, 9 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, this could be speedy deleted as a G5 (created by sock of banned user) I guess, but letting the AfD finish would be stronger as it would make clear that the deletion is about the subject, not solely about the creator of the article. Fram (talk) 08:01, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.